Aurora Nosei vs Carlotta Moccia Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 10:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nosei vs C. Moccia

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nosei 1 - 0 Moccia
They have played 3 sets in total, with Aurora Nosei winning 2 and Carlotta Moccia winning 1. The last match between Aurora Nosei and Carlotta Moccia was at the W15 Solarino, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Aurora Nosei getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nosei | 1 |
| Moccia | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Solarino(10-29-25)
A. Nosei vs C. Moccia H2H Profile
A. Nosei vs C. Moccia Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows a slight edge for Carlotta Moccia, winning 38.26% of points compared to Aurora Nosei's 33.07%. Does this give Moccia the advantage? Likely, as second serve reliability is crucial.
- In return games, Aurora Nosei outperforms Carlotta Moccia, with 55.26% of second serve return wins vs. 53.53%, and a significant 8.11% lead in first serve return points.
- Breakpoints saved are slightly in Moccia’s favor at 52.31%, compared to Nosei’s 47.54%, indicating better under-pressure play for Moccia.
- Performance over the last year favors Carlotta Moccia, with a winning rate of 57.14% against Aurora Nosei’s 46.67%.
- Both players achieve their best performance on hard courts with identical winning percentages, yet neither excels on clay.
- While playing mostly at Challengers/ITF events, Moccia maintains a 54.17% win rate. Nosei, frequently competing in Futures/Satellites/ITF matches, holds a 50% win record.
- Average opponent rank gives Nosei an edge, facing higher-ranked players (59) than Moccia (289.07), although this reflects differences in competition faced.
- In deciding sets, Carlotta Moccia secures 20% wins, whereas Aurora Nosei has yet to claim victory in any deciding sets over the last 12 months, suggesting potential difficulties in lengthy matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the statistical data for this upcoming tennis match, Carlotta Moccia appears to hold several advantages. Her slightly better performance on second serves and a strong ability to save breakpoints suggest resilience and effectiveness under pressure.
On the other hand, Aurora Nosei demonstrates a prowess in return games, outperforming Moccia particularly on first serve returns. However, her inability to secure wins in deciding sets reveals potential challenges in endurance and mental fortitude when matches extend to their limits.
Considering both players' performances over the past year, with Moccia maintaining a higher match win percentage, the numbers slightly tilt in her favor. Despite Nosei facing stronger opponents on average, this match seems positioned for Moccia’s taking.
Based on these factors, Carlotta Moccia is the likely winner for this match.
Aurora Nosei vs Carlotta Moccia Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Nosei vs C. Moccia H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:1:15 | Average Match Time | 2:1:15 |
| 58% (45/77) | 1st Serve % | 60% (49/82) |
| 67% (30/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (34/49) |
| 50% (16/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (11/33) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 45% (37/82) | Return Points Win % | 40% (31/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Nosei Recent Matches Played
C. Moccia Recent Matches Played

A. Nosei vs C. Moccia Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (9/9) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.28% (68/70) |
| 52.50% (21/19) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.78% (160/149) |
| 52.59% (183/165) | Games Win/Loss | 50.41% (1460/1436) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.33% (43/32) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 25.00% (6/18) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 61 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 33 | Total Double Faults | 439 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 49.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 313.16 |
| 63% (302/481) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3160/5285) |
| 52% (157/302) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1877/3160) |
| 40% (71/179) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (910/2125) |
| 46% (26/56) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (285/646) |
| 47% (223/472) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2333/5260) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 43.90% (18/23) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Futures W/L | 51.55% (50/47) |
| 50% (9/18) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (68/138) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (12/25) |
| 25% (1/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 27% (9/33) |
| 73% (11/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 76% (83/63) |
| 27% (11/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 24% (83/20) |
| 14% (7/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (55/5) |